NBC Sports President Rick Cordella has decided to suspend Bengals’ Super Bowl legend Cris Collinsworth just hours after his disrespectful remarks about the Steelers, right before the crucial matchup between the Steelers and Bengals this Sunday. SOSAD

NBC Sports President Rick Cordella has decided to suspend Bengals’ Super Bowl legend Cris Collinsworth just hours after his disrespectful remarks about the Steelers, right before the crucial matchup between the Steelers and Bengals this Sunday.

Los Angeles, California – November 14, 2025

NBC Sports has immediately suspended Cris Collinsworth, the Super Bowl legend from the Cincinnati Bengals, after an inappropriate comment he made during Sunday Night Football sparked a social media storm. Collinsworth’s remark came during the game between the Los Angeles Chargers and Pittsburgh Steelers on the evening of November 13, 2025, just days before the crucial matchup between the Pittsburgh Steelers and Cincinnati Bengals scheduled for Sunday, November 14.

Article image

During the broadcast of the Chargers-Steelers game, Collinsworth made a controversial statement while describing the lack of offensive action in the game: “Eventually, someone needs to bust one out.” Although his intent was to describe a breakthrough in the game, the phrase is commonly understood in a sexual context, which led to strong criticism from fans and experts on social media. Collinsworth’s comment quickly became a hot topic, prompting NBC Sports to take swift action.

NBC Sports issued an official statement confirming Collinsworth’s suspension, stating:

“We are aware of the comments made during Sunday Night Football and have decided to suspend Cris Collinsworth immediately, pending an internal review. We hold ourselves to the highest standards of professionalism on air.”

NBC Sports President Rick Cordella also addressed the incident, emphasizing the company’s commitment to maintaining broadcasting integrity:

“We regret that Cris’s comment was made on air,” Cordella said. “We are committed to ensuring that our broadcasts reflect the standards our audience expects. We will conduct a thorough review and take appropriate action.”

Collinsworth, who has earned 3 Pro Bowl selections and 1 Super Bowl championship during his career, is no stranger to viral moments, but this is the first time NBC has taken disciplinary action against him. The network’s decision reflects the increasing scrutiny that sports broadcasters face in the age of social media, where every word can instantly become a subject of controversy.

With the important Steelers vs Bengals game coming up on Sunday, NBC Sports has decided to have veteran host Mike Tirico continue as the primary play-by-play announcer, while a temporary analyst will be brought in to replace Collinsworth for the time being. The suspension will be reviewed as part of NBC’s ongoing evaluation.

This incident is likely to affect NBC’s image, but with a commitment to upholding high standards, the network hopes to regain the trust of its audience in the near future.

Related Posts

TRUMP LOSES IT as HUGE PROTESTS DEMAND IMPEACHMENT — Massive Crowds Explode Nationwide, Rage Boils Over & White House Faces Total Revolt Nightmare! 🔥 teptep

In cities from coast to coast, large crowds have gathered in recent days to voice deep frustration with President Donald J. Trump’s administration, with many demonstrators explicitly…

⚠️ CLINTON CALLS TRUMP’S BLUFF ON EPSTEIN PUBLIC HEARING AMID CONGRESSIONAL PROBE! 😲 chuong

The Clintons Agree to Testify in Epstein Inquiry, Reigniting a Debate Over Accountability and Transparency WASHINGTON — After months of resistance, Bill Clinton and Hillary Clinton have…

TEXAS TREMOR: Democrats Stun in Long-Held GOP Seat, Triggering Trump Whiplash and 2026 Alarm Bells – phanh

**🚨 TEXAS TREMOR: Democrats Stun in Long-Held GOP Seat, Triggering Trump Whiplash and 2026 Alarm Bells**   In a political earthquake that has sent shockwaves through the…

Trump Faces Unprecedented Legal Countdown After Supreme Court Denies Emergency Bail In a stark, one-line order that has sent seismic shocks through the American political and legal landscape, the Supreme Court has denied an emergency application from former President Donald J. Trump to stay his pre-trial release conditions and delay impending court proceedings. The decision, issued without noted dissent or commentary, marks a decisive inflection point, clearing the final procedural hurdle for Special Counsel Jack Smith’s prosecution to proceed on its accelerated schedule. The ruling is the third and most significant judicial denial in a matter of days, following similar rejections by both the presiding federal District Court judge and a unanimous panel of the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals. The message from all three levels of the federal judiciary is unequivocal: no special treatment, no procedural carve-outs, even for a figure who once commanded America’s highest office. “The countdown has officially begun,” stated a senior official within the Special Counsel’s office, speaking on background. With the emergency bail and stay request off the table, the path is now clear for the case—centering on allegations of conspiracy to defraud the United States and obstruction of an official proceeding related to the January 6, 2021, Capitol riot—to move toward a trial that could begin before the November election. **The Legal Roadblock Removed** Trump’s legal team had filed the emergency application with the Supreme Court late Sunday, arguing that allowing the case to proceed would cause “irreparable injury” to both the former president’s ability to campaign and to the “principle of equal justice,” claiming he was being subjected to a politically motivated “rush to judgment.” They sought a administrative stay that would have effectively frozen all activity until the full Court could consider a more formal appeal. The Supreme Court’s denial, while not a ruling on the merits of any future appeal, signals a profound unwillingness to intercede as a procedural safety net. Legal analysts view it as an endorsement of the lower courts’ reasoning, which emphasized the profound public interest in a speedy trial for charges that strike at the heart of democratic governance. “Three judicial stages, three denials,” noted constitutional law professor Dr. Elena Moretti. “This is the judiciary speaking with one voice. The principle at play here is that no person, regardless of former station, is entitled to special delays when facing serious criminal charges of this nature. By refusing to step in, the Supreme Court has affirmed that the ordinary processes of justice must apply.” **The Haunting Question of History** The decision catapults the nation into uncharted territory. The haunting question now hanging in the air, debated in legal seminars and whispered in the halls of Congress, is whether the United States is on the brink of an unprecedented historical moment: the potential criminal conviction and possible imprisonment of a former President who is the presumptive nominee of a major political party. For Special Counsel Jack Smith, the Court’s move is a green light. His team, described by associates as operating with methodical urgency for months, is now expected to press forward with pre-trial motions and witness lists. Key elements of their case were previewed in last week’s dramatic deposition to Congress, where Smith revealed evidence alleging Trump’s real-time awareness of the Capitol riot and his deliberate refusal to act. The political ramifications are instantaneous and profound. Trump’s campaign has already issued a fiery statement calling the Supreme Court’s action “a dark day for American justice and a testament to the weaponization of our legal system by the Biden administration.” Meanwhile, the former president’s rivals within the Republican Party are faced with a stark choice: double down on claims of a “two-tiered system” or begin to distance themselves from a nominee navigating an active federal criminal trial. Financial markets reacted with nervous volatility, and security agencies are reportedly conducting enhanced threat assessments, aware that the legal containment of a figure with such a devoted following carries unpredictable risks. As the procedural machinery grinds forward with new inevitability, the nation is left to confront a foundational stress test. The coming weeks will see legal arguments about executive immunity and admissible evidence, but the broader trial will be one of national identity. Can the institutions designed to check power withstand the immense pressure of applying their own rules to the man who once sat at their apex? The Supreme Court, with its simple, firm “no,” has indicated that the process itself must provide the answer. The countdown, in every sense, is now underway.-thaoo

Trump Faces Unprecedented Legal Countdown After Supreme Court Denies Emergency Bail In a stark, one-line order that has sent seismic shocks through the American political and legal…

🚨 JUST IN: Federal Judge ORDERS Trump to TESTIFY in 48 HOURS — or FACE CONTEMPT ⚖️🔥 XAMXAM

By XAMXAM Washington was jolted this week by reports that a federal judge has ordered Donald Trump to appear and testify within 48 hours or risk being…

JUST IN: PAM BONDI FACES IMPEACHMENT PROCEEDINGS OVER ALLEGED EPSTEIN RECORD COVER-UP – phanh

EXCLUSIVE: PAM BONDI FACES IMPEACHMENT PROCEEDINGS OVER ALLEGED EPSTEIN RECORD COVER-UP Tallahassee, FL — In a political earthquake shaking the foundations of Florida’s political establishment, former Florida…

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *