💥 BREAKING SHOCKER: NFL HITS BILLS STAR WITH HARSH PUNISHMENT OVER “BANNED TD CELEBRATION” — LEAGUE ACCUSED OF OVERREACTING AS FANS ERUPT IN CONTROVERSY AND DEMAND ANSWERS ⚡ SADBOIZ

The Buffalo Bills had their emotional ups and downs over in the month of November, to say the least. An inspiring and, it seemed at the time, season-defining 28-21 win against the archrival Kansas City Chiefs kicked off the month on Nov. 2. But that was followed just seven days later by a dispiriting 30-13 loss to the struggling Miami Dolphins.

A week after that, another high point as reigning NFL MVP quarterback Josh Allen threw for three touchdowns and ran for three more in a wild, 44-32 triumph over the NFC South-leading Tampa Bay Buccaneers. This time, the Bills had just four days before the elation came crashing down with a 23-19

Thursday Night Football defeat to the Houston Texans.

So in the middle of their turbulent and taxing stretch, it surely couldn’t hurt if one Bills player tried to have a little fun with a somewhat silly if slightly suggestive touchdown celebration. Could it?

Not according to the NFL.

Johnson’s Fake Hamstring Pull Celebration

In the Week 11 game against visiting Tampa Bay, on a play with just 36 seconds left in the first half, Allen flicked a backfield pass to second-string running back Ty Johnson, a 2019 sixth-round draft pick of the Detroit Lions who has scored only five touchdowns in his seven-year career with three different teams.

This time, however, Johnson took Allen’s pass five yards behind the line of scrimmage, found an opening around the left hash mark, and dashed another 52 yards for his sixth career TD, making the score 21-10 in the Bills’ favor, after the extra point, going into halftime.

Ty Johnson Solidifying His Spot as Buffalo's RB2 | Veii Apparel

That was all just fine. It’s what he did to display his joy in the end zone that the NFL Operations Department frowned upon.

Johnson first grabbed the back of his right leg as if in pain from a hamstring injury. He then lay face down on the turf and twice pounded his right fist on the surface, feigning frustration at the “injury.” But as he pounded his fist, he also raised and pumped his hips twice in a motion that, though Johnson may have been trying to disguise it as his reaction to a pretend hamstring pull, had a sexually suggestive element that could not be missed.

Two Bills Players Fined in Week 11

NFL officials did not miss it. On Saturday, the league announced that it was slapping the 28-year-old Johnson with a fine of $10,777 for what the league’s weekly GameDay Accountability report termed “obscene gestures.”

The officials on the field did not see it that way. Johnson was not flagged on the field for the apparently risqué touchdown celebration.

The NFL bans touchdown celebrations that it deems to simulate or represent “sexual acts.”

The fine was one of two handed out to Bills players. Defensive end Joey Bosa was hit with his second fine in four games, a $17,389 assessment for roughing the passer this time, the eighth fine of Bosa’s nine years in the NFL.

1 Penalty, 2 Fines in 2025

For Johnson, however, the Week 11 fine was only his second in seven seasons — but also his second this season. In the game versus the Chiefs on Nov. 2 he was flagged for a facemask violation and hit with a $10,778 fine, just one dollar more than his fine for “obscene gestures.”

The penalty against Kansas City was Johnson’s first and so far only on-field flag of the season. That means the former Maryland Terrapin has been penalized once and fined twice this year.

Related Posts

TEXAS TREMOR: Democrats Stun in Long-Held GOP Seat, Triggering Trump Whiplash and 2026 Alarm Bells – phanh

**🚨 TEXAS TREMOR: Democrats Stun in Long-Held GOP Seat, Triggering Trump Whiplash and 2026 Alarm Bells**   In a political earthquake that has sent shockwaves through the…

Trump Faces Unprecedented Legal Countdown After Supreme Court Denies Emergency Bail In a stark, one-line order that has sent seismic shocks through the American political and legal landscape, the Supreme Court has denied an emergency application from former President Donald J. Trump to stay his pre-trial release conditions and delay impending court proceedings. The decision, issued without noted dissent or commentary, marks a decisive inflection point, clearing the final procedural hurdle for Special Counsel Jack Smith’s prosecution to proceed on its accelerated schedule. The ruling is the third and most significant judicial denial in a matter of days, following similar rejections by both the presiding federal District Court judge and a unanimous panel of the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals. The message from all three levels of the federal judiciary is unequivocal: no special treatment, no procedural carve-outs, even for a figure who once commanded America’s highest office. “The countdown has officially begun,” stated a senior official within the Special Counsel’s office, speaking on background. With the emergency bail and stay request off the table, the path is now clear for the case—centering on allegations of conspiracy to defraud the United States and obstruction of an official proceeding related to the January 6, 2021, Capitol riot—to move toward a trial that could begin before the November election. **The Legal Roadblock Removed** Trump’s legal team had filed the emergency application with the Supreme Court late Sunday, arguing that allowing the case to proceed would cause “irreparable injury” to both the former president’s ability to campaign and to the “principle of equal justice,” claiming he was being subjected to a politically motivated “rush to judgment.” They sought a administrative stay that would have effectively frozen all activity until the full Court could consider a more formal appeal. The Supreme Court’s denial, while not a ruling on the merits of any future appeal, signals a profound unwillingness to intercede as a procedural safety net. Legal analysts view it as an endorsement of the lower courts’ reasoning, which emphasized the profound public interest in a speedy trial for charges that strike at the heart of democratic governance. “Three judicial stages, three denials,” noted constitutional law professor Dr. Elena Moretti. “This is the judiciary speaking with one voice. The principle at play here is that no person, regardless of former station, is entitled to special delays when facing serious criminal charges of this nature. By refusing to step in, the Supreme Court has affirmed that the ordinary processes of justice must apply.” **The Haunting Question of History** The decision catapults the nation into uncharted territory. The haunting question now hanging in the air, debated in legal seminars and whispered in the halls of Congress, is whether the United States is on the brink of an unprecedented historical moment: the potential criminal conviction and possible imprisonment of a former President who is the presumptive nominee of a major political party. For Special Counsel Jack Smith, the Court’s move is a green light. His team, described by associates as operating with methodical urgency for months, is now expected to press forward with pre-trial motions and witness lists. Key elements of their case were previewed in last week’s dramatic deposition to Congress, where Smith revealed evidence alleging Trump’s real-time awareness of the Capitol riot and his deliberate refusal to act. The political ramifications are instantaneous and profound. Trump’s campaign has already issued a fiery statement calling the Supreme Court’s action “a dark day for American justice and a testament to the weaponization of our legal system by the Biden administration.” Meanwhile, the former president’s rivals within the Republican Party are faced with a stark choice: double down on claims of a “two-tiered system” or begin to distance themselves from a nominee navigating an active federal criminal trial. Financial markets reacted with nervous volatility, and security agencies are reportedly conducting enhanced threat assessments, aware that the legal containment of a figure with such a devoted following carries unpredictable risks. As the procedural machinery grinds forward with new inevitability, the nation is left to confront a foundational stress test. The coming weeks will see legal arguments about executive immunity and admissible evidence, but the broader trial will be one of national identity. Can the institutions designed to check power withstand the immense pressure of applying their own rules to the man who once sat at their apex? The Supreme Court, with its simple, firm “no,” has indicated that the process itself must provide the answer. The countdown, in every sense, is now underway.-thaoo

Trump Faces Unprecedented Legal Countdown After Supreme Court Denies Emergency Bail In a stark, one-line order that has sent seismic shocks through the American political and legal…

🚨 JUST IN: Federal Judge ORDERS Trump to TESTIFY in 48 HOURS — or FACE CONTEMPT ⚖️🔥 XAMXAM

By XAMXAM Washington was jolted this week by reports that a federal judge has ordered Donald Trump to appear and testify within 48 hours or risk being…

JUST IN: PAM BONDI FACES IMPEACHMENT PROCEEDINGS OVER ALLEGED EPSTEIN RECORD COVER-UP – phanh

EXCLUSIVE: PAM BONDI FACES IMPEACHMENT PROCEEDINGS OVER ALLEGED EPSTEIN RECORD COVER-UP Tallahassee, FL — In a political earthquake shaking the foundations of Florida’s political establishment, former Florida…

A Constitutional Threshold Crossed: 47 Republicans Break Ranks as Impeachment Momentum Builds-thaoo

A Constitutional Threshold Crossed: 47 Republicans Break Ranks as Impeachment Momentum Builds Washington, D.C. – The United States Capitol, a building accustomed to political storms, is bracing…

⚠️ TRUMP REIGN ENDS AS IMPEACHMENT VOTE SEALS FATE!! 🔥chuong

WASHINGTON — A long-simmering effort among House Democrats to revive impeachment talk against President Trump collided this week with the hard math of governing: even when impeachment…

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *