GAMEDAY: Time, TV schedule, live stream to watch Week 7 game – EAGLES vs VIKINGS. OCD

The Philadelphia Eagles (4-2)  are set to face the Minnesota Vikings (3-2) in a crucial Week 7 matchup of the 2025 NFL season. With both teams looking to build momentum, this afternoon game promises high-stakes action as the Eagles aim to snap a two-game losing streak and climb the NFC standings, while the Vikings ride the energy of a bye week and key players returning from injury.

As the Eagles prepare for this road clash, they’ll be dealing with some injury concerns on the offensive and defensive lines, but the return of full practices for key players could provide a boost. On the other side, the Vikings enter with momentum from a comeback victory in Week 5, boasting a balanced offense led by a new starting quarterback. Here’s everything you need to know about how to watch the game, including TV channels, live streaming options, and the latest team updates.

How to Watch Eagles vs. Vikings NFL Week 7 Game

  • Date: Sunday, October 19, 2025
  • Time: 1:00 p.m. ET (10:00 a.m. PT)
  • Location: U.S. Bank Stadium — Minneapolis, Minnesota
  • TV Channel: FOX
  • Live Stream: FuboTV, NFL+, FOX Sports app, YouTube TV (with Sunday Ticket for out-of-market viewers)
  • Radio: 94 WIP in Philadelphia; KFAN (100.3 FM) in Minneapolis; SiriusXM channel 225 (Eagles broadcast) or 226 (Vikings broadcast)

Fans in local markets can tune into FOX for the broadcast, featuring Kevin Burkhardt on play-by-play, Tom Brady providing analysis, and Erin Andrews on the sidelines. For those without cable, streaming services like NFL+ offer live access to the game with a subscription.

International viewers can catch the action via NFL Game Pass International, while military personnel stationed overseas have options through the American Forces Network.

Eagles vs. Vikings Live Stream Options

If you’re cutting the cord, several platforms carry FOX’s NFL coverage:

  • NFL+: Stream the game live with a Premium subscription ($6.99/month) or Premium Plus ($14.99/month) for ad-free viewing.
  • FuboTV: Includes FOX in most markets; free trial available.
  • Sling TV: Blue package ($40/month) carries FOX in select areas.
  • YouTube TV: Base plan ($72.99/month) includes FOX; offers a free trial.
  • Hulu + Live TV: ($76.99/month) with FOX access.

For mobile viewing, download the FOX Sports or Yahoo Sports app to stream on your phone or tablet, provided you’re in a participating market.

Eagles Team Update Ahead of Week 7

The Eagles (4-2) enter Week 7 looking to rebound from a challenging stretch, having lost their last two games after a strong 4-0 start to the season. Head coach Nick Sirianni has emphasized offensive consistency and a stronger pass rush, noting recent adjustments in practice to address defensive vulnerabilities and turnover issues.

Key storylines include:

  • Quarterback Situation: Jalen Hurts remains the starter, but the offense has struggled with consistency, averaging just 23.7 points per game. Sirianni provided updates earlier this week, highlighting the need for better protection and fewer turnovers.
  • Injury Report: Left guard Landon Dickerson (ankle) and defensive tackle Jalen Carter (heel) are both questionable, though Carter is expected to play. Cornerback Quinyon Mitchell (hamstring) is good to go after full participation in practice. Other notables include several players on IR like DeVonta Smith (eligible after Week 7), and the team is monitoring around 10 players overall.
  • Recent Form: Philadelphia has shown flashes of their championship-caliber play but struggles with consistency, particularly in the passing game and run defense following back-to-back losses. The team is focusing on containing Vikings QB Carson Wentz and his weapons like Justin Jefferson and Jordan Addison.
  • Milestones: Keep an eye on running back Saquon Barkley, who is on pace for a strong season and could approach career rushing milestones, with projections for over 97.5 rushing + receiving yards in this game.

Vikings Team Update Ahead of Week 7

The Minnesota Vikings (3-2) head into this matchup with strong momentum after a comeback victory over the Bears in Week 5, followed by a bye week that allowed key players to heal. Head coach Kevin O’Connell has the team peaking at the right time, with the Vikings ranking highly in rushing offense and showing defensive improvements.

Key storylines include:

  • Quarterback Situation: Carson Wentz will start, backed up by Max Brosmer, with rookie J.J. McCarthy questionable due to an ankle injury. Wentz faces his former team in a revenge game scenario, bringing experience to the huddle.
  • Injury Report: The Vikings are monitoring 11 players, with outside linebacker Andrew Van Ginkel ruled out (neck). Questionable players include defensive lineman Tyrion Ingram-Dawkins (hip), quarterback J.J. McCarthy (ankle), right tackle Brian O’Neill (knee), and center Michael Jurgens (hamstring). On a positive note, linebacker Blake Cashman and outside linebacker Tyler Batty have been activated from IR.
  • Recent Form: Minnesota is coming off a bye after a Week 5 win, with their ground game strong and defense allowing just points in recent outings. The team is focusing on exploiting the Eagles’ recent inconsistencies, setting up a tough test for Philadelphia’s depleted unit.
  • Milestones: Wide receiver Justin Jefferson remains a key target, on pace for another 1,000-yard season. The rushing attack, led by the offense, averages high yards per game.

Eagles vs. Vikings Prediction and Odds

  • Spread: Eagles -2.5 (via FOX Bet)
  • Moneyline: Eagles -130, Vikings +110
  • Over/Under: 43.5 points

Experts lean toward a close game, with the Eagles’ road advantage potentially tipping the scales despite recent losses. ESPN’s Football Power Index gives Philadelphia a 55% chance of victory, but the Vikings’ home-field at U.S. Bank Stadium and bye week rest could make it a defensive battle. Prediction: Eagles 24, Vikings 20.

Don’t miss this NFC showdown—tune in to see if the Eagles can turn the tide or if the Vikings continue their surge! For more NFL coverage, check out our full schedule and analysis.

Related Posts

Trump Faces Unprecedented Legal Countdown After Supreme Court Denies Emergency Bail In a stark, one-line order that has sent seismic shocks through the American political and legal landscape, the Supreme Court has denied an emergency application from former President Donald J. Trump to stay his pre-trial release conditions and delay impending court proceedings. The decision, issued without noted dissent or commentary, marks a decisive inflection point, clearing the final procedural hurdle for Special Counsel Jack Smith’s prosecution to proceed on its accelerated schedule. The ruling is the third and most significant judicial denial in a matter of days, following similar rejections by both the presiding federal District Court judge and a unanimous panel of the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals. The message from all three levels of the federal judiciary is unequivocal: no special treatment, no procedural carve-outs, even for a figure who once commanded America’s highest office. “The countdown has officially begun,” stated a senior official within the Special Counsel’s office, speaking on background. With the emergency bail and stay request off the table, the path is now clear for the case—centering on allegations of conspiracy to defraud the United States and obstruction of an official proceeding related to the January 6, 2021, Capitol riot—to move toward a trial that could begin before the November election. **The Legal Roadblock Removed** Trump’s legal team had filed the emergency application with the Supreme Court late Sunday, arguing that allowing the case to proceed would cause “irreparable injury” to both the former president’s ability to campaign and to the “principle of equal justice,” claiming he was being subjected to a politically motivated “rush to judgment.” They sought a administrative stay that would have effectively frozen all activity until the full Court could consider a more formal appeal. The Supreme Court’s denial, while not a ruling on the merits of any future appeal, signals a profound unwillingness to intercede as a procedural safety net. Legal analysts view it as an endorsement of the lower courts’ reasoning, which emphasized the profound public interest in a speedy trial for charges that strike at the heart of democratic governance. “Three judicial stages, three denials,” noted constitutional law professor Dr. Elena Moretti. “This is the judiciary speaking with one voice. The principle at play here is that no person, regardless of former station, is entitled to special delays when facing serious criminal charges of this nature. By refusing to step in, the Supreme Court has affirmed that the ordinary processes of justice must apply.” **The Haunting Question of History** The decision catapults the nation into uncharted territory. The haunting question now hanging in the air, debated in legal seminars and whispered in the halls of Congress, is whether the United States is on the brink of an unprecedented historical moment: the potential criminal conviction and possible imprisonment of a former President who is the presumptive nominee of a major political party. For Special Counsel Jack Smith, the Court’s move is a green light. His team, described by associates as operating with methodical urgency for months, is now expected to press forward with pre-trial motions and witness lists. Key elements of their case were previewed in last week’s dramatic deposition to Congress, where Smith revealed evidence alleging Trump’s real-time awareness of the Capitol riot and his deliberate refusal to act. The political ramifications are instantaneous and profound. Trump’s campaign has already issued a fiery statement calling the Supreme Court’s action “a dark day for American justice and a testament to the weaponization of our legal system by the Biden administration.” Meanwhile, the former president’s rivals within the Republican Party are faced with a stark choice: double down on claims of a “two-tiered system” or begin to distance themselves from a nominee navigating an active federal criminal trial. Financial markets reacted with nervous volatility, and security agencies are reportedly conducting enhanced threat assessments, aware that the legal containment of a figure with such a devoted following carries unpredictable risks. As the procedural machinery grinds forward with new inevitability, the nation is left to confront a foundational stress test. The coming weeks will see legal arguments about executive immunity and admissible evidence, but the broader trial will be one of national identity. Can the institutions designed to check power withstand the immense pressure of applying their own rules to the man who once sat at their apex? The Supreme Court, with its simple, firm “no,” has indicated that the process itself must provide the answer. The countdown, in every sense, is now underway.-thaoo

Trump Faces Unprecedented Legal Countdown After Supreme Court Denies Emergency Bail In a stark, one-line order that has sent seismic shocks through the American political and legal…

🚨 JUST IN: Federal Judge ORDERS Trump to TESTIFY in 48 HOURS — or FACE CONTEMPT ⚖️🔥 XAMXAM

By XAMXAM Washington was jolted this week by reports that a federal judge has ordered Donald Trump to appear and testify within 48 hours or risk being…

JUST IN: PAM BONDI FACES IMPEACHMENT PROCEEDINGS OVER ALLEGED EPSTEIN RECORD COVER-UP – phanh

EXCLUSIVE: PAM BONDI FACES IMPEACHMENT PROCEEDINGS OVER ALLEGED EPSTEIN RECORD COVER-UP Tallahassee, FL — In a political earthquake shaking the foundations of Florida’s political establishment, former Florida…

A Constitutional Threshold Crossed: 47 Republicans Break Ranks as Impeachment Momentum Builds-thaoo

A Constitutional Threshold Crossed: 47 Republicans Break Ranks as Impeachment Momentum Builds Washington, D.C. – The United States Capitol, a building accustomed to political storms, is bracing…

⚠️ TRUMP REIGN ENDS AS IMPEACHMENT VOTE SEALS FATE!! 🔥chuong

WASHINGTON — A long-simmering effort among House Democrats to revive impeachment talk against President Trump collided this week with the hard math of governing: even when impeachment…

The U.S. Supreme Court has quietly announced a sealed ruling that has rocked Washington — and directly impacted Trump’s legal chamber. Trump is terrified.1Washington has been pulled tight like a drawn wire as leaked details of a secret Supreme Court decision suddenly spill into public view. There was no press conference. No official statement. Just a silent move powerful enough to shake the entire political system. According to what has been revealed, the Supreme Court issued a sealed subpoena aimed directly at Donald Trump. More importantly, the ruling came with a hard deadline. Seventy-two hours to comply. No extensions. No delays. The requested materials are believed to involve financial transactions, relationships with foreign individuals, and sensitive election-related information. Legal sources say this is not an ordinary case, but the result of a grand jury investigation that has been unfolding quietly for more than a year. The Supreme Court used rare authority to keep the entire process in the dark, signaling a level of seriousness tied to national security concerns. Trump is reported to have attempted to rely on presidential immunity and executive privilege, but those arguments were dismissed without fanfare. Once the case reached the Supreme Court, every delay tactic came to an abrupt end. This ruling leaves no legal escape hatch. The Court made one thing unmistakably clear. No individual, including a former president, stands above the law. The 72-hour deadline immediately threw Trump’s legal team into chaos. Some attorneys are reportedly considering withdrawal, fearing the legal consequences of continued resistance. Trump responded by attacking the justices and questioning the legitimacy of the ruling. Legal experts warn that such statements could expose him to contempt of court charges. For the first time in modern history, the possibility of a former president being detained before trial no longer feels unthinkable. Legal scholars have begun comparing the moment to the historic United States v. Nixon case. Public opinion is starting to shift, even among Republican voters, as the belief that “no one is above the law” gains traction. Trump now faces only two paths. Comply. Or confront the Supreme Court head-on. Both roads carry consequences that could permanently alter America’s political and legal landscape. The question hanging over everything is simple — and explosive. Will Donald Trump submit to the rule of law, or push the system toward an unprecedented constitutional crisis?

Washington has been pulled tight like a drawn wire as leaked details of a secret Supreme Court decision suddenly spill into public view. There was no press…

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *