NFL Announces Discipline For Jarvis Brownlee After Wwe-Style Slam On Stefon Diggs – Also Opens Investigation Into Possible “Retaliation” Motive. SOSAD

New York, NY – The NFL has officially stepped in after a controversial tackle that set both the New England Patriots and New York Jets on fire. Jets cornerback Jarvis Brownlee Jr. has been hit with a hefty fine for his WWE-style slam on Stefon Diggs at Gillette Stadium, and more importantly, the league has opened a separate investigation to determine whether the hit was simply an excessive football play or a calculated act of personal retaliation.

NFL spokesman: Roger Goodell views new contract as his last – The Denver  Post

According to a statement from the NFL’s disciplinary office, Brownlee has been fined $18,620 for unnecessary roughness / late hit on Diggs in the Week 11 opener. The baseline fine for a first late-hit offense under the collective bargaining agreement is $11,593, but because Brownlee is a

repeat offender within the same season, the amount was increased.

Earlier this year, in the season opener while still playing for the Tennessee Titans against the Denver Broncos, Brownlee was fined

$5,808 for a facemask penalty. Picking up a second fine in less than three months has pushed him into the league’s informal “heightened monitoring” category.

Although he was fined, Brownlee was not suspended. However, the NFL emphasized the “unnecessary and dangerous” nature of the hit and warned that any similar incident could lead to a suspension.

The incident occurred less than nine minutes into the Jets–Patriots game. Drake Maye fired an 8-yard pass to Stefon Diggs, who has become a cornerstone of New England’s offense after signing a three-year, $63.5 million deal before the season. As he has done so often, Diggs made the catch and tried to churn out a few extra yards.

Brownlee quickly closed in and wrapped Diggs up around the upper body. But instead of simply driving him to the ground, he flipped Diggs and slammed him into the turf at Gillette Stadium in a move that looked straight out of a WWE ring. Officials immediately threw a flag, hitting the Jets with a 15-yard penalty for unnecessary roughness – but the outrage from the Patriots’ sideline and across social media made it clear the story wouldn’t end with a yellow flag.

“We have to decide whether we’re really protecting players or not, and it starts with plays like that,” one Patriots staffer said anonymously. “He didn’t need to throw Diggs down like that. Football is already violent enough.”

NFL opens probe into possible “retaliation”

What surprised many was that the league’s statement did not stop at the fine. A note at the end confirmed that the NFL is

opening a supplemental investigation into the broader context around the play, including “prior interactions between the two players, on-field verbal exchanges, and any indications that this was a deliberate act of personal retaliation.”

Sources say the league’s disciplinary department will:

  • Review all snaps and matchups between Brownlee and Diggs from the start of the game.

  • Check mic’d-up and on-field audio, where available, for any threats or comments suggesting someone was “going to get him back.”

  • Interview game officials and supervisors about the level of tension between the two sides prior to the hit.

Some inside the Patriots’ building believe the slam was more than just an emotional play. Diggs had previously made a big catch right in front of Brownlee, followed by a celebration and some trash talk. “If you watch the tape, you can see it getting hotter every snap,” a Patriots source said.

On the Jets’ side, the organization has been careful but firm in defending its player. The head coach said:

“We accept the NFL’s decision. It was a play that went over the line, and Jarvis understands that. But from everything I know about him, there was no personal vendetta against Stefon Diggs. Jarvis is a physical player, but he’s not out there trying to hurt people.”

Brownlee also released a brief statement through the team:

“I play with a lot of emotion, and on that snap, I went too far. I apologize to Stefon and to my fellow players across the league. But I did not go into that play trying to retaliate or injure him. I accept the fine and I’ll adjust how I play.”

Under league rules, Brownlee has the right to appeal the fine through the NFLPA, but it is not yet clear whether he plans to do so.

Stefon Diggs, the player on the receiving end of the slam, struck a calmer tone rather than escalating the drama.

“I don’t want to see anybody lose money, but we’ve got to protect players,” Diggs said. “I can’t read his heart, I don’t know if that was retaliation or not. I just know it was a play that didn’t need to happen. Hopefully everybody learns from it and we move forward.”

His response helped cool things down somewhat, especially in the context of a Patriots–Jets rivalry that has, in the past, spilled into toxic territory off the field—from the days of Bill Parcells and Bill Belichick to the Spygate saga.

By increasing Brownlee’s fine and launching a deeper probe, the NFL is once again sending a familiar but increasingly firm message: playing physical is not a license for plays that could end someone’s career in a single second.

Depending on the outcome of the retaliation investigation, Brownlee may walk away with only a financial penalty, or he could receive a formal disciplinary warning added to his record. Either way, his name—and that WWE-style slam on Diggs—will almost certainly be cited in future discussions about the thin line between high-intensity football and reckless danger.

Related Posts

TRUMP LOSES IT as HUGE PROTESTS DEMAND IMPEACHMENT — Massive Crowds Explode Nationwide, Rage Boils Over & White House Faces Total Revolt Nightmare! 🔥 teptep

In cities from coast to coast, large crowds have gathered in recent days to voice deep frustration with President Donald J. Trump’s administration, with many demonstrators explicitly…

⚠️ CLINTON CALLS TRUMP’S BLUFF ON EPSTEIN PUBLIC HEARING AMID CONGRESSIONAL PROBE! 😲 chuong

The Clintons Agree to Testify in Epstein Inquiry, Reigniting a Debate Over Accountability and Transparency WASHINGTON — After months of resistance, Bill Clinton and Hillary Clinton have…

TEXAS TREMOR: Democrats Stun in Long-Held GOP Seat, Triggering Trump Whiplash and 2026 Alarm Bells – phanh

**🚨 TEXAS TREMOR: Democrats Stun in Long-Held GOP Seat, Triggering Trump Whiplash and 2026 Alarm Bells**   In a political earthquake that has sent shockwaves through the…

Trump Faces Unprecedented Legal Countdown After Supreme Court Denies Emergency Bail In a stark, one-line order that has sent seismic shocks through the American political and legal landscape, the Supreme Court has denied an emergency application from former President Donald J. Trump to stay his pre-trial release conditions and delay impending court proceedings. The decision, issued without noted dissent or commentary, marks a decisive inflection point, clearing the final procedural hurdle for Special Counsel Jack Smith’s prosecution to proceed on its accelerated schedule. The ruling is the third and most significant judicial denial in a matter of days, following similar rejections by both the presiding federal District Court judge and a unanimous panel of the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals. The message from all three levels of the federal judiciary is unequivocal: no special treatment, no procedural carve-outs, even for a figure who once commanded America’s highest office. “The countdown has officially begun,” stated a senior official within the Special Counsel’s office, speaking on background. With the emergency bail and stay request off the table, the path is now clear for the case—centering on allegations of conspiracy to defraud the United States and obstruction of an official proceeding related to the January 6, 2021, Capitol riot—to move toward a trial that could begin before the November election. **The Legal Roadblock Removed** Trump’s legal team had filed the emergency application with the Supreme Court late Sunday, arguing that allowing the case to proceed would cause “irreparable injury” to both the former president’s ability to campaign and to the “principle of equal justice,” claiming he was being subjected to a politically motivated “rush to judgment.” They sought a administrative stay that would have effectively frozen all activity until the full Court could consider a more formal appeal. The Supreme Court’s denial, while not a ruling on the merits of any future appeal, signals a profound unwillingness to intercede as a procedural safety net. Legal analysts view it as an endorsement of the lower courts’ reasoning, which emphasized the profound public interest in a speedy trial for charges that strike at the heart of democratic governance. “Three judicial stages, three denials,” noted constitutional law professor Dr. Elena Moretti. “This is the judiciary speaking with one voice. The principle at play here is that no person, regardless of former station, is entitled to special delays when facing serious criminal charges of this nature. By refusing to step in, the Supreme Court has affirmed that the ordinary processes of justice must apply.” **The Haunting Question of History** The decision catapults the nation into uncharted territory. The haunting question now hanging in the air, debated in legal seminars and whispered in the halls of Congress, is whether the United States is on the brink of an unprecedented historical moment: the potential criminal conviction and possible imprisonment of a former President who is the presumptive nominee of a major political party. For Special Counsel Jack Smith, the Court’s move is a green light. His team, described by associates as operating with methodical urgency for months, is now expected to press forward with pre-trial motions and witness lists. Key elements of their case were previewed in last week’s dramatic deposition to Congress, where Smith revealed evidence alleging Trump’s real-time awareness of the Capitol riot and his deliberate refusal to act. The political ramifications are instantaneous and profound. Trump’s campaign has already issued a fiery statement calling the Supreme Court’s action “a dark day for American justice and a testament to the weaponization of our legal system by the Biden administration.” Meanwhile, the former president’s rivals within the Republican Party are faced with a stark choice: double down on claims of a “two-tiered system” or begin to distance themselves from a nominee navigating an active federal criminal trial. Financial markets reacted with nervous volatility, and security agencies are reportedly conducting enhanced threat assessments, aware that the legal containment of a figure with such a devoted following carries unpredictable risks. As the procedural machinery grinds forward with new inevitability, the nation is left to confront a foundational stress test. The coming weeks will see legal arguments about executive immunity and admissible evidence, but the broader trial will be one of national identity. Can the institutions designed to check power withstand the immense pressure of applying their own rules to the man who once sat at their apex? The Supreme Court, with its simple, firm “no,” has indicated that the process itself must provide the answer. The countdown, in every sense, is now underway.-thaoo

Trump Faces Unprecedented Legal Countdown After Supreme Court Denies Emergency Bail In a stark, one-line order that has sent seismic shocks through the American political and legal…

🚨 JUST IN: Federal Judge ORDERS Trump to TESTIFY in 48 HOURS — or FACE CONTEMPT ⚖️🔥 XAMXAM

By XAMXAM Washington was jolted this week by reports that a federal judge has ordered Donald Trump to appear and testify within 48 hours or risk being…

JUST IN: PAM BONDI FACES IMPEACHMENT PROCEEDINGS OVER ALLEGED EPSTEIN RECORD COVER-UP – phanh

EXCLUSIVE: PAM BONDI FACES IMPEACHMENT PROCEEDINGS OVER ALLEGED EPSTEIN RECORD COVER-UP Tallahassee, FL — In a political earthquake shaking the foundations of Florida’s political establishment, former Florida…

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *